Piantedosi at hearing: checks with Spain will not be lifted before August 15
The Interior Minister reports to the parliamentary Schengen Committee: three arrests and twenty-one pushbacks since the reinstatement of checks, no certainty on the transit of those turned back from Ceuta. A story the morning edition had not reported.
This morning’s opening concerned the September agenda announced by the Prime Minister. Meanwhile the border chapter moved from political statement to parliamentary account: on August 13 the Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi was heard by the parliamentary Committee overseeing the implementation of the Schengen Agreement, and set out the timetable for the suspension decided after the Ceuta crisis (ANSA, Avvenire).
The timetable point is clear: the suspension of the application of the Agreement will not be reviewed before August 15, 2026. The political condition for lifting it, on the other hand, is framed in open terms: “We will revoke the Schengen halt only with the total end of the risks”, the minister said. A threshold of this kind — the elimination of risk, not its reduction — has no associated numerical indicator, and effectively leaves the exit date to the government’s discretionary assessment.
The figures behind the measure
The account of the operation, as presented by the minister, is quantitatively limited: since the reinstatement of checks, three arrests have been made and twenty-one third-country nationals have been turned back, six of them Moroccan. Asked whether the people turned back had transited through Ceuta, Piantedosi said he was unable to say, because those who arrived in the enclave had not been identified.
This is the most significant admission of the hearing, and it is worth isolating: the measure was adopted in response to a specific event, but there is at present no verification linking the people stopped at the Italian border to that event. The failure to identify people in Ceuta is a limitation upstream, on Spanish territory, that no downstream check can retroactively make up for.
| Item | Figure reported by the minister |
|---|---|
| Arrests since the reinstatement of checks | 3 |
| Third-country nationals turned back | 21 (6 of them Moroccan) |
| Landings in Italy since the start of 2026 | around 17,000, −55% compared to 2025 |
The figure on landings — a 55% drop compared to 2025, for a total of around seventeen thousand people — is the one the government uses as a measure of the overall effectiveness of its line. It does not, however, concern the border with Spain, which is by land and air: the two figures describe different phenomena and cannot be added together.
The diplomatic and political framework
Piantedosi was careful to distance the decision from any reading of it as hostile toward Madrid, ruling out that the Italian initiative constitutes an act against Spain. The Spanish government, for its part, has introduced extraordinary checks on passports and identity documents in response to the Italian decision: the reciprocity of the measures, more than the words, gauges the temperature between the two executives.
On the domestic front, the picture remains polarized but along different lines. The Prime Minister relaunched the government’s line, insisting on border defense, security and rule compliance; the Secretary of the Democratic Party Elly Schlein shifted the terrain of the confrontation to the cost of living: “With her propaganda against migrants, nobody is paying our rent for us” (Askanews, Il Tempo).
The next verifiable deadline is the date indicated by the minister: the suspension remains in place at least until August 15, and from that moment any extension or revocation will be a declared decision, not an automatic one.
← Archive · Front page · Past editorials · Report an error · Original article (in Italian)