Redazione Zero Sections IT ES EN

Updated at 16:30 (Italian time) 19 Sept 2026

Italy · Analysis Wednesday, 9 September 2026 · Morning edition, 6:30 · AI-generated content, without human review

Former Ilva, Palazzo Chigi talks break off for two hours and resume

The government proposes a permanent table on the Taranto area and does not rule out public participation, provided a solid industrial plan is submitted. On the table weigh 2,500 dismissal letters in the supply chain.

Fotografia d'archivio, non riferita ai fatti descritti nell'articolo
Immagine d'archivio, non riferita ai fatti descritti. Foto di Willians Huerta su Pexels

On September 8, 2026, the Prime Minister’s office convened a series of successive meetings at Palazzo Chigi on the future of former Ilva: first the local authorities, then the employers’ organizations, finally the unions. Undersecretary Alfredo Mantovano presided; for the government, ministers Adolfo Urso, Gilberto Pichetto Fratin, Tommaso Foti and Marina Calderone were present, along with Undersecretary Sbarra and advisor Caldoro (Il Diario del Lavoro, Secolo d’Italia).

The most widely reported moment of the day was an interruption. According to union sources, the talks with the metalworkers were suspended after about two hours due to “strong tension”, and then resumed (Agenzia Nova). The characterization of the atmosphere comes from one of the parties at the table: it is a union description of the meeting, not official minutes.

The government’s two proposals

On the procedural level, Mantovano proposed establishing a permanent table dedicated to the Taranto area at the Prime Minister’s office, citing as organizational precedents the structures used for the 2025 Jubilee and for the Terra dei Fuochi. On substance, the government does not rule out public participation in former Ilva, but makes it conditional on the presentation of an industrial plan deemed solid and credible (Secolo d’Italia, TarantoToday).

The two openings carry different weight. The first is an organizational decision the government can make on its own; the second is a hypothesis contingent on a document that, in the available excerpts, does not appear to have been filed or evaluated yet.

What the territories and unions are asking for

The President of the Puglia Region, Antonio Decaro, asked for two distinct things: a special law for Taranto and a halt to the dismissal procedures. “We asked for a special law for Taranto,” he said at the end of the meeting (Agenzia Nova).

The request regarding the dismissals is not theoretical. In Taranto, 2,500 dismissal letters were sent to workers in contracted and supply-chain firms of former Ilva (Radio Onda d’Urto, Today.it). Fim Cisl asked the government for the immediate withdrawal of the procedure, with an explicit statement: “We are asking for the immediate withdrawal of the dismissal procedure” (TarantoToday).

According to the September 9 press review, the most representative associations of supply-chain companies reportedly expressed support for freezing the collective dismissals launched the previous week (Today.it). The conditional phrasing comes from the source: no formal act of suspension appears in the excerpts.

The government does not rule out public participation, provided a solid and credible industrial plan is submitted.

The dispute’s three scales

The dispute over former Ilva has lasted more than fifteen years (Radio Onda d’Urto). Within the day’s talks at Palazzo Chigi, three different time horizons coexist: the letters already sent, which have immediate procedural deadlines; the industrial plan, which is the condition set by the government for discussing public capital; the special law requested by the Region, which would require passage through Parliament.

What we don’t know

The excerpts do not contain the date of the first meeting of the proposed permanent table, nor its composition. They do not indicate who should present the industrial plan on which the government conditions possible public entry, nor by when. There is no reported response from the government to the request to withdraw the dismissal procedure, nor a formal position on the special law.

The Chamber and Senate resume sitting from Wednesday, September 9, after the summer break (Sky TG24): this is the venue through which a special law, should the government decide to pursue that path, would need to pass.

← Archive · Front page · Past editorials · Report an error · Original article (in Italian)