Snettisham's gold torcs reread as a collective ritual, and Herculaneum papyri become legible again
A review signed by the British Museum and the University of Cambridge proposes that the Norfolk torcs were deposited in a ritual marking a change in the way power was displayed. In Oxford, meanwhile, virtual unwrapping is yielding two new Herculaneum texts.
Since the late 1940s, on a wooded hill in Norfolk called Ken Hill, the deposits known as the Snettisham hoards have repeatedly come to light: rings, ingots, coins, bracelets and above all torcs, the rigid gold collars of the late British Iron Age, datable roughly to between 350 and 60 BC. Further deposits were excavated over the following six decades, many by the British Museum in the early 1990s.
Now a comprehensive review of the complex, signed by Julia Farley of the British Museum and Jody Joy of the Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology at the University of Cambridge, proposes a unified reading: the torcs would not simply have been hidden, but deposited as part of a collective ritual marking a shift in the way authority was communicated.
The news currently comes from a single source (Archaeology Magazine, reporting on the study by the two archaeologists); no independent confirmation available.
Why the difference between hiding and depositing matters
A hoard buried to keep it safe and a hoard buried to remove it from circulation tell of two different societies. In the first case, the gold remains wealth awaiting recovery; in the second, it becomes an object withdrawn from circulation, and the act of deposition is itself the message. Farley and Joy’s hypothesis places Snettisham in the second category and links it to a transition: the way power is displayed changes, and the fate of the objects that displayed that power changes accordingly.
In Oxford the burnt scrolls speak
The day’s second thread concerns the Herculaneum papyri, discovered in the mid-18th century and largely left unrolled owing to the fragility of the carbonized material. Virtual unwrapping techniques — which open the scrolls without touching them and read their contents — are yielding texts never read before.
Among the recent results are a Stoic text identified in PHerc 1667 and the first book of Philodemus’s “On Vices” in PHerc 172. The results will be presented by Michael McOsker in a lecture at Oxford’s Weston Library on 22 October 2026. Here too, the news currently comes from a single source (the Bodleian Libraries’ programme, reported by The Past/Current Archaeology); no independent confirmation available.
A carbonized scroll that yields an author’s title is, in ancient philology, the equivalent of a find made during excavation.
The exhibition calendar
On the exhibition front, the Munich State Archaeological Collection opens a Stonehenge-themed exhibition on 18 September 2026, running until 29 August 2027. In Athens, the National Archaeological Museum is hosting “Pylos of Nestor: a Mycenaean kingdom revealed” until 31 October 2026, having opened on 25 May. At the State Museum of Prehistory in Halle, “The Shamaness”, curated by Anja Stadelbacher, Josefine Biedinger and Michael Schefzik, runs until 7 February 2027. In Newcastle, the Great North Museum: Hancock closes “Treasure: Hidden, Lost, Found”, a free-admission exhibition, on 20 September 2026.
What we don’t know
We do not have the full text of the Snettisham review nor the venue of its scholarly publication, and we do not know the amount of text actually made legible in the two Herculaneum papyri: virtual reading yields portions, not always entire books. Two verifiable dates remain fixed: 18 September for the Munich opening and 22 October for the Oxford lecture.
Sources: Archaeology Magazine; The Past / Current Archaeology; American Journal of Archaeology; North East Museums.
← Archive · Front page · Past editorials · Report an error · Original article (in Italian)