Bomb threats: Madrid speaks of psychological warfare after new evacuations
After the second wave of false alarms recorded yesterday, the first institutional reactions arrive: the Irish government suggests a coordinated campaign, the Spanish foreign minister speaks of hybrid aggression, Moscow denies involvement.
After the second consecutive day of false bomb threats against flights, airports and newsrooms in Europe, the first public institutional reactions to the phenomenon are emerging. Among the most significant episodes are the evacuations that affected newspaper and television newsrooms in Dublin, which took place on the eve of a European summit. This is reported by Geopolitical Briefings and Sarno Notizie. No explosive device has been found in any of the searches conducted following the alerts, a factor that reinforces the hypothesis of a campaign of threats posing no immediate physical danger but still capable of generating operational disruptions and widespread public alarm.
The Irish government has spoken of a likely coordinated campaign behind the sequence of threats, without providing further details on their origin. Spanish Foreign Minister José Manuel Albares has also taken a public stance, describing the wave of alerts as a hybrid aggression.
“hybrid aggression and psychological warfare” — José Manuel Albares, Spanish Foreign Minister
Moscow has denied any involvement in the matter, according to the same source. Investigators, Geopolitical Briefings reports, are currently trying to establish whether there is a link between this wave of bomb threats and the cyberattacks that in recent weeks have hit infrastructure and civilian services in several European countries — a thread that, if confirmed, would turn apparently unrelated episodes into a single campaign against the continent’s public security. The hypothesis of a single orchestrating hand has not been verified by investigators.
At present, none of the sources consulted point to a confirmed origin for the alerts, nor to an identified perpetrator: the statements from Dublin and Madrid remain political hypotheses, not conclusions of a formal investigation. The matter falls within a context of growing attention to the cyber and physical security of European infrastructure, in which false alarms and digital sabotage are now being examined jointly by the observers cited in the available sources.