Trump confirms Witkoff and Kushner mission between Kyiv and Moscow
The US president says his two envoys are travelling to Ukraine and Russia with a proposal to end the war. On the same evening Zelensky announces he has approved new military responses to the attacks on cities.
The diplomatic day of September 4 closed with two movements heading in opposite directions. At the White House Donald Trump confirmed at a press conference that special envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner are travelling to Ukraine and Russia with a proposal to end the war. A few hours later, in his evening address, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky announced that he had approved the proposals presented by the Ukrainian Security Service and the Armed Forces to respond to Russian attacks on cities.
The reconstruction of the press conference and the evening address is from the Kyiv Post; the picture of Russian positions and events on the ground comes from the review by Just Security, which draws on Reuters dispatches. These are two separate sources, as required by this newspaper’s charter.
What Trump said
The politically sharpest point of the press conference concerns not the content of the proposal, which has not been made public, but the diagnosis of the deadlock. Trump attributed the lack of progress in negotiations to personal animosity between Zelensky and Vladimir Putin: a reading that shifts the obstacle from the terrain of conditions — territories, guarantees, sanctions — to that of relations between the two heads of state.
This is not a neutral explanation. If the problem is the character of the protagonists, the solution is a mediator who keeps them apart, and that is exactly the role the Witkoff and Kushner mission outlines: two envoys carrying the same text to two capitals without bringing anyone together. If instead the problem is the conditions, the trip serves to measure how far apart they are, not to close the gap.
What Moscow said, and what Kyiv did
On September 3, according to Reuters, Putin had stated that there is a possibility of reaching an agreement to end the war and that several countries, including the United States and China, would be willing to support it. This is a verbal opening, not a commitment: no conditions or timeline are indicated in the material available.
On the Ukrainian side the signal is of a different nature. Zelensky did not announce a negotiating position but an operational decision: the proposals from the security services and armed forces to respond to the bombing of cities have been approved. From the material available, only the approval emerges and nothing more: no stated objective, no timeline, no detail on the nature of the actions. His original remarks are in English and exceed the word limit this newspaper has set for quotations: we summarize them rather than reporting them in quotation marks.
Meanwhile the conflict has continued to produce casualties in Russian territory as well. A Ukrainian attack on Belgorod killed four people, including two healthcare workers: the figure comes from the region’s official headquarters, reported by Reuters, and has not been independently verified at this time.
What we don’t know
A great deal, and it is better to say so upfront.
We don’t know the content of the proposal the two envoys are carrying. We don’t know whether it is a single text presented to both capitals or two different documents. We don’t know whether the legs of the trip were agreed with Moscow and Kyiv or merely announced by Washington. No official Russian or Ukrainian reaction to the mission as such appears in the material available.
Above all, we don’t know how the two September 4 announcements relate to each other. A government that approves a package of military responses while a mediator is in flight may be building a stronger negotiating position, or it may be signaling that it does not consider negotiations imminent. Both readings, on the facts available today, are compatible with what was said.
The timeframe for verification is short: the legs of the mission, if they take place, will or will not produce a public document and a reaction from the two capitals. Until then, the only established fact is that the US president placed responsibility for the deadlock on the persons of the two heads of state, and that the Ukrainian president approved the response proposals to the attacks in the same hours.
← Archive · Front page · Past editorials · Report an error · Original article (in Italian)