Assyrian letters read without breaking the envelopes: scanning enters the Kanesh archives
New story compared to this morning, when the Culture desk covered prizes and theatre seasons: a scanning technology allows, for the first time, cuneiform tablets still sealed to be read. Among the texts, a letter from 3,800 years ago written by a woman.
For centuries Assyriology has worked under a simple and destructive material constraint: cuneiform correspondence was often enclosed in clay envelopes, and to read the message the envelope had to be broken. The container, with its seals and impressions, was lost in order to bring out the content.
A study signed by C. Michel and colleagues, published in the journal npj Heritage Science, reports that for the first time a scanning technology has allowed scholars to read the messages without destroying the casing (Archaeology Magazine). The news currently comes from a single source — Archaeology Magazine, which reports on the study — and lacks independent confirmation in the excerpts available to us.
What was read
Among the texts made readable in the ancient city of Kanesh is a letter from 3,800 years ago sent by a woman named Anna-anna to her husband Ennum-Ashur. In the text Anna-anna expresses frustration over attempts to recover silver owed to her husband and complains that the debtor refuses to pay her directly (Archaeology Magazine).
The documentary value is twofold. On one hand, a female voice in Bronze Age commercial correspondence, dealing with a practical collection problem. On the other, the fact recorded by the letter: a woman handles a credit matter belonging to her spouse, and the debtor refuses to settle it into her hands. The reasons for that refusal do not appear in the available excerpts.
The limits of the story
The available excerpts do not specify which scanning technique was used, at what resolution, on how many tablets, or with what readability rate. They do not indicate where the documents are held or who funded the research. A single study, however published in a journal, does not amount to the adoption of a method by the scientific community: confirmation will depend on replicability across other archives and on the judgment of independent groups.
An excavation campaign in Anatolia
In the same week, archaeologists working at the ancient city of Pompeiopolis, in northern Türkiye, announced on 8 September 2026 that they had uncovered an area of approximately 105 square meters (Arkeonews). Here too the news comes from a single source — the archaeological mission’s statement picked up by the specialized outlet — with no independent verification available.
The same source reports two other excavation activities of the week: an Iron Age burial in northern Scotland and prehistoric worked wood on the shores of a lake in southern Greece.
Why we publish it while declaring its fragility
This newspaper had already noted, on 30 August, how archaeological information often arrives through a single source and on timelines set by the missions themselves: we wrote as much regarding the Roman cargo in Lake Neuchâtel (Redazione Zero, 30 August 2026). The same rule applies today: excavation press releases and journal notices are material from an interested party, and the scope of what can be asserted is limited to what the source declares.
Today’s verifiable fact remains the extent of the area excavated at Pompeiopolis and the existence of a publication in npj Heritage Science describing the non-destructive reading of sealed tablets.
Sources: Archaeology Magazine (on a study by C. Michel and others, npj Heritage Science 2026), Arkeonews.
← Archive · Front page · Past editorials · Report an error · Original article (in Italian)